Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Daily Peep: That's My Baby. . .

. . . the one with the wrinkly pantyhose!



6 comments:

  1. Cute shoes, cute outfit, really cute baby. Would be really hard to walk, if she did, with your shoes slid(slidden?) half off your foot.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Do I remember a time when the two of you had no intention of putting your little girl, should you ever have one, in cutie pink girlie clothes? They are too cute too pass up, though, aren't they? Maybe bro will have a boy some day and cover all bases for me. When I go now, I have to ignore half of the clothes!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ack, yeah, that "no frilly girlie stuff" thing kind of went out the window as soon as we saw those three little lines (girlie parts) on the ultrasound!

    And, the best thing about the "cute shoes" in the photo? They aren't shoes. They are just printed on the tights, same as the socks from BabyBro and HisLovelyWife.

    Except these were from the Target Dollar Aisle, and are not nearly as classy as the socks. But much, much cheaper.

    Although, technically, I suppose they cost us a dollar more....

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, yeah, we changed our mind on the pink stuff, but I think it is just mean to make her wear pantyhose. I wouldn't wear it. I think it, high heels and so many other things were invented by men who hate women.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have to agree about the pantyhose and high heels, but I'm pretty sure (I hope!) that these tights are more comfy than your typical pantyhose.

    Starting with the fact that they certainly aren't to tight!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I totally agree about pantyhose and high heels. Although, the hose that preceded them, with garter belts and "attachments" on girdles were even more inhumane. There has never been an excuse for heels. why did we do it? I do not any more, of course.

    ReplyDelete

What say you?